<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 117 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237662</link>
    <description>SC analyzed the liability of Revenue to pay interest when Advance Tax or TDS exceeds assessed tax. The Court clarified that Revenue&#039;s interest obligation is limited to statutory provisions under Section 244A of Income Tax Act. The landmark Sandvik case was reinterpreted as an exceptional compensation scenario, not a general rule for interest on interest. The Court rejected automatic entitlement to penal interest, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 117 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237662</link>
      <description>SC analyzed the liability of Revenue to pay interest when Advance Tax or TDS exceeds assessed tax. The Court clarified that Revenue&#039;s interest obligation is limited to statutory provisions under Section 244A of Income Tax Act. The landmark Sandvik case was reinterpreted as an exceptional compensation scenario, not a general rule for interest on interest. The Court rejected automatic entitlement to penal interest, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>