<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237657</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, upholding the classification of share issue expenses as capital expenditure due to their direct link to capital base expansion, regardless of the unsuccessful outcome. The judgment reiterated the precedence of purpose over end result in determining the nature of expenditure and emphasized the consistent application of legal principles in distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237657</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, upholding the classification of share issue expenses as capital expenditure due to their direct link to capital base expansion, regardless of the unsuccessful outcome. The judgment reiterated the precedence of purpose over end result in determining the nature of expenditure and emphasized the consistent application of legal principles in distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>