<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 106 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237651</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments. It found that the unsigned sale agreement photocopy lacked validity once a registered sale deed was executed, and criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on guesswork. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of substantial proof to support their claims of undisclosed income. Ultimately, the Court supported ITAT&#039;s decision and concluded that the unsigned agreement held no legal weight in determining the consideration amount for the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 106 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237651</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments. It found that the unsigned sale agreement photocopy lacked validity once a registered sale deed was executed, and criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on guesswork. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of substantial proof to support their claims of undisclosed income. Ultimately, the Court supported ITAT&#039;s decision and concluded that the unsigned agreement held no legal weight in determining the consideration amount for the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>