<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237650</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the penalty order imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT&#039;s deletion of the quantum addition due to lack of evidence supporting the AO&#039;s presumption of cash settlement from seized cheques led to the penalty being set aside. The Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as no substantial question of law arose from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237650</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the penalty order imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT&#039;s deletion of the quantum addition due to lack of evidence supporting the AO&#039;s presumption of cash settlement from seized cheques led to the penalty being set aside. The Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as no substantial question of law arose from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>