<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 104 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237649</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing precedents from the Uttarakhand High Court and a Tribunal Bench. It concluded that there was no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment regarding Income Tax Act provisions. The appeal questioning the interpretation of Sections 192(1) and 192(3) was dismissed, emphasizing that the obligation to pay deducted tax extends until the end of the financial year, regardless of the timing of deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 104 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237649</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing precedents from the Uttarakhand High Court and a Tribunal Bench. It concluded that there was no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment regarding Income Tax Act provisions. The appeal questioning the interpretation of Sections 192(1) and 192(3) was dismissed, emphasizing that the obligation to pay deducted tax extends until the end of the financial year, regardless of the timing of deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>