<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 93 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237638</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted without the need for further deposit, and there was a stay on the collection of the pending penalty during the appeal process. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions, particularly section 78 of the Finance Act 1994, in determining penalties for tax-related matters, as well as the importance of timely payments and effective presentation of cases during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 93 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237638</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted without the need for further deposit, and there was a stay on the collection of the pending penalty during the appeal process. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions, particularly section 78 of the Finance Act 1994, in determining penalties for tax-related matters, as well as the importance of timely payments and effective presentation of cases during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>