https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237632 A public authority may de-register and debar a contractor for legitimate contractual and administrative reasons, and judicial review is limited to cases of arbitrariness, perversity, illegality, or mala fides. The challenge to competence and procedure failed because the banning guidelines were inapplicable to the transaction, the show-cause notice was approved by the competent higher authority, and no prejudice arose from the alleged loss of one appellate stage. The finding of misconduct was also upheld because the contractor was able for its agent's conduct, including forged documents and misuse of another entity's name, and the five-year debarment was not shown to be excessive. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237632 A public authority may de-register and debar a contractor for legitimate contractual and administrative reasons, and judicial review is limited to cases of arbitrariness, perversity, illegality, or mala fides. The challenge to competence and procedure failed because the banning guidelines were inapplicable to the transaction, the show-cause notice was approved by the competent higher authority, and no prejudice arose from the alleged loss of one appellate stage. The finding of misconduct was also upheld because the contractor was able for its agent's conduct, including forged documents and misuse of another entity's name, and the five-year debarment was not shown to be excessive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237632