<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 64 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237609</link>
    <description>The court upheld the judgment of the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. It was held that the Department could not proceed against the properties owned by the wife and children of the defaulter without proper adjudication. The Writ Appeals were dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 64 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237609</link>
      <description>The court upheld the judgment of the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. It was held that the Department could not proceed against the properties owned by the wife and children of the defaulter without proper adjudication. The Writ Appeals were dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>