<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237606</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order directing appellants to deposit 15% of confirmed duty, citing insufficient consideration of retracted statements and ongoing related adjudication. The Court emphasized the need for thorough evaluation of evidence before making impactful decisions. The Tribunal was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits without necessitating pre-deposit, with no cost orders issued for both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237606</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order directing appellants to deposit 15% of confirmed duty, citing insufficient consideration of retracted statements and ongoing related adjudication. The Court emphasized the need for thorough evaluation of evidence before making impactful decisions. The Tribunal was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits without necessitating pre-deposit, with no cost orders issued for both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>