<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237602</link>
    <description>In a central excise pre-deposit dispute, the Tribunal&#039;s assessment of prima facie case and financial hardship was held not to be perverse or vitiated by any apparent error. On that basis, the High Court found no ground to exercise writ jurisdiction over the waiver application. Interference with the pre-deposit order was therefore declined, and the request for waiver or reduction of pre-deposit was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237602</link>
      <description>In a central excise pre-deposit dispute, the Tribunal&#039;s assessment of prima facie case and financial hardship was held not to be perverse or vitiated by any apparent error. On that basis, the High Court found no ground to exercise writ jurisdiction over the waiver application. Interference with the pre-deposit order was therefore declined, and the request for waiver or reduction of pre-deposit was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>