https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237595 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to delay, as the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. Despite citing various judgments on limitation rules, the appellant's argument was deemed insufficient. The Tribunal found the delay to be deliberate, as the appellant neglected to provide the correct address for communication of the order. The Court concluded that no substantial legal questions were raised, affirming the dismissal of the Central Excise & Customs Appeal. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237595 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to delay, as the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. Despite citing various judgments on limitation rules, the appellant's argument was deemed insufficient. The Tribunal found the delay to be deliberate, as the appellant neglected to provide the correct address for communication of the order. The Court concluded that no substantial legal questions were raised, affirming the dismissal of the Central Excise & Customs Appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237595