<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 48 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CCI&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed that the Government of India, as a consumer, has the right to choose its service providers and that the Office Memorandum did not violate Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal also found no contravention of Article 14 of the Constitution and no basis for invoking the doctrine of legitimate expectation. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 48 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CCI&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed that the Government of India, as a consumer, has the right to choose its service providers and that the Office Memorandum did not violate Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal also found no contravention of Article 14 of the Constitution and no basis for invoking the doctrine of legitimate expectation. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>