<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 45 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237590</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.2,00,000 within 8 weeks under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the waiver of penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The balance of the penalty was waived subject to compliance, considering the appellant&#039;s financial challenges and stay on recovery pending appeal disposal. The appellant&#039;s admission of liability, non-compliance with procedures, and collection of tax from clients were key factors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, despite arguments of no intention to evade tax and financial hardships due to a mining ban.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 45 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237590</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.2,00,000 within 8 weeks under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the waiver of penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The balance of the penalty was waived subject to compliance, considering the appellant&#039;s financial challenges and stay on recovery pending appeal disposal. The appellant&#039;s admission of liability, non-compliance with procedures, and collection of tax from clients were key factors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, despite arguments of no intention to evade tax and financial hardships due to a mining ban.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>