https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237586 The appeal against the rejection on the bar of limitation was dismissed as the appellate authority lacked jurisdiction to condone the significant delay of over 20 months in filing the appeal under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's failure to provide adequate evidence or justification for the delay led to the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines and presenting relevant facts for condonation of delay in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237586 The appeal against the rejection on the bar of limitation was dismissed as the appellate authority lacked jurisdiction to condone the significant delay of over 20 months in filing the appeal under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's failure to provide adequate evidence or justification for the delay led to the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines and presenting relevant facts for condonation of delay in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237586