<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 32 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237577</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to reject the amendment application, emphasizing the necessity of primary evidence for the share transfer, the irrelevance of the proposed amendments, and the lack of due diligence by the appellant. The appeal and application were dismissed with costs imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 32 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237577</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to reject the amendment application, emphasizing the necessity of primary evidence for the share transfer, the irrelevance of the proposed amendments, and the lack of due diligence by the appellant. The appeal and application were dismissed with costs imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>