https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237572 The Bombay High Court quashed the ex parte order under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944, dated July 2011, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Court found that the question of duty demand on damaged goods before clearance was not adequately addressed by the Revisional Authority, leading to the setting aside of the order. The case was restored to the Revisional Authority for reevaluation in line with the law, with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237572 The Bombay High Court quashed the ex parte order under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944, dated July 2011, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Court found that the question of duty demand on damaged goods before clearance was not adequately addressed by the Revisional Authority, leading to the setting aside of the order. The case was restored to the Revisional Authority for reevaluation in line with the law, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237572