<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 26 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237571</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, confirming the dropping of the excise duty demand on finished products found short during a search. The Court found that the reconciliation statement submitted by the Director, supported by evidence from seized lot registers, demonstrated no shortage of fabrics except for a specific quantity. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the seized documents established the accuracy of entries, leading to the conclusion that there was no merit in contesting the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 26 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237571</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, confirming the dropping of the excise duty demand on finished products found short during a search. The Court found that the reconciliation statement submitted by the Director, supported by evidence from seized lot registers, demonstrated no shortage of fabrics except for a specific quantity. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the seized documents established the accuracy of entries, leading to the conclusion that there was no merit in contesting the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>