<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237568</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the Revisional Authority&#039;s order and restoring the revision for disposal on merits within three months. The judgment emphasized timely resolution of the appeal in accordance with the law, referencing the exclusion of time spent before the Tribunal to meet the limitation period. The ruling was absolute with no order as to costs, concluding the legal proceedings comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237568</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the Revisional Authority&#039;s order and restoring the revision for disposal on merits within three months. The judgment emphasized timely resolution of the appeal in accordance with the law, referencing the exclusion of time spent before the Tribunal to meet the limitation period. The ruling was absolute with no order as to costs, concluding the legal proceedings comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>