<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237563</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee on both issues. It emphasized the importance of correctly applying tax laws to prevent double taxation and ensure fair treatment of deductions related to excise duties and MODVAT credits. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on established principles from previous court judgments, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237563</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee on both issues. It emphasized the importance of correctly applying tax laws to prevent double taxation and ensure fair treatment of deductions related to excise duties and MODVAT credits. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on established principles from previous court judgments, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>