<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 8 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237553</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the reassessment notice and order dated 28th September, 2010. The reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2006-07 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act were deemed invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, without any new factual information emerging post the initial assessment order. The court emphasized the distinction between incorrect application of law and change of opinion, stating that reassessment should only occur in cases of the former, with Section 263 of the Act being the appropriate recourse for addressing errors in legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 8 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237553</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the reassessment notice and order dated 28th September, 2010. The reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2006-07 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act were deemed invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, without any new factual information emerging post the initial assessment order. The court emphasized the distinction between incorrect application of law and change of opinion, stating that reassessment should only occur in cases of the former, with Section 263 of the Act being the appropriate recourse for addressing errors in legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>