<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 3 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237548</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 273-A of the Income Tax Act, citing reasons such as substantial income, habitual default in filing returns, and delayed payments of government revenue for assessment years 1985-86, 1986-87, and 1987-88. The judgment emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s discretion in reducing or waiving penalties must align with the factors outlined in Section 273-A, and any decision must be solely based on the provisions of that section to be valid. Additionally, a separate case challenging an order under the Wealth Tax Act was remitted for a fresh decision in accordance with legal principles similar to the Income Tax Act case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 3 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237548</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 273-A of the Income Tax Act, citing reasons such as substantial income, habitual default in filing returns, and delayed payments of government revenue for assessment years 1985-86, 1986-87, and 1987-88. The judgment emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s discretion in reducing or waiving penalties must align with the factors outlined in Section 273-A, and any decision must be solely based on the provisions of that section to be valid. Additionally, a separate case challenging an order under the Wealth Tax Act was remitted for a fresh decision in accordance with legal principles similar to the Income Tax Act case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>