<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 971 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237539</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee&#039;s activities qualified as manufacturing under Section 80 IC. The Court emphasized the transformation of raw materials into distinct products with altered characteristics, aligning with legal definitions. Citing relevant precedents, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the eligibility for tax deduction and concluding the case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 971 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237539</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee&#039;s activities qualified as manufacturing under Section 80 IC. The Court emphasized the transformation of raw materials into distinct products with altered characteristics, aligning with legal definitions. Citing relevant precedents, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the eligibility for tax deduction and concluding the case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>