<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 934 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237502</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 1.30 crores, citing pending appeals and ambiguity regarding the retrospective nature of an amendment to CENVAT Credit Rules. The Court found the issue debatable and decided to hear the appeal on merits without requiring the pre-deposit, ultimately quashing the CESTAT&#039;s order and disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 934 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237502</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 1.30 crores, citing pending appeals and ambiguity regarding the retrospective nature of an amendment to CENVAT Credit Rules. The Court found the issue debatable and decided to hear the appeal on merits without requiring the pre-deposit, ultimately quashing the CESTAT&#039;s order and disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>