https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237501 The appeal was admitted after the appellant filed an affidavit of service, deeming the service on respondents as sufficient. The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the grounds as good and sufficient. The Central Excise Department's appeal alleging clandestine removal of goods was dismissed as the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal period, barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The penalty on the appellant, its directors, and officials was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was ultimately dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's decision. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237501 The appeal was admitted after the appellant filed an affidavit of service, deeming the service on respondents as sufficient. The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the grounds as good and sufficient. The Central Excise Department's appeal alleging clandestine removal of goods was dismissed as the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal period, barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The penalty on the appellant, its directors, and officials was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was ultimately dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237501