<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 932 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237500</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on duty-paid glass shells re-entering the factory after being stored due to space constraints, because their duty-paid character was established and there was no finding of clandestine removal. The absence of an invoice was only a procedural defect and did not defeat credit. The earlier penalty order also did not record that the goods had been received without payment of duty, so it could not justify denial of credit on re-entry. No substantial question of law arose on the grounds raised, and the credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 932 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237500</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on duty-paid glass shells re-entering the factory after being stored due to space constraints, because their duty-paid character was established and there was no finding of clandestine removal. The absence of an invoice was only a procedural defect and did not defeat credit. The earlier penalty order also did not record that the goods had been received without payment of duty, so it could not justify denial of credit on re-entry. No substantial question of law arose on the grounds raised, and the credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>