<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 930 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237498</link>
    <description>Where an appeal against the order-in-original has already been dismissed as time-barred, the writ court will not direct condonation of delay or interfere with the adjudication order. Applying that principle, the Bombay HC found no basis to entertain the writ petition because the statutory appeal had been rejected on limitation. The challenge to the impugned order therefore failed, and the petition was not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 930 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237498</link>
      <description>Where an appeal against the order-in-original has already been dismissed as time-barred, the writ court will not direct condonation of delay or interfere with the adjudication order. Applying that principle, the Bombay HC found no basis to entertain the writ petition because the statutory appeal had been rejected on limitation. The challenge to the impugned order therefore failed, and the petition was not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>