https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237496 The High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision to dismiss the appellant's application for an extension of time to deposit the balance amount of demand under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant's claims of health issues and subsequent deposit of the remaining amount, the Court found no valid reasons for the delay in compliance. The appellant failed to provide sufficient reasons for seeking additional time, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court emphasized that the appellant had ample opportunity to fulfill the payment obligation within the specified period, ultimately affirming the Tribunal's decision. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237496 The High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision to dismiss the appellant's application for an extension of time to deposit the balance amount of demand under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant's claims of health issues and subsequent deposit of the remaining amount, the Court found no valid reasons for the delay in compliance. The appellant failed to provide sufficient reasons for seeking additional time, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court emphasized that the appellant had ample opportunity to fulfill the payment obligation within the specified period, ultimately affirming the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237496