<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 920 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237488</link>
    <description>The High Court instructed the respondent authorities to promptly conclude the investigation into the seized money, setting a deadline of four months from the date of receiving the judgment. The court emphasized the importance of timely completion of investigations involving potential violations of the FEMA Act, despite not entirely agreeing with the relief sought by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 920 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237488</link>
      <description>The High Court instructed the respondent authorities to promptly conclude the investigation into the seized money, setting a deadline of four months from the date of receiving the judgment. The court emphasized the importance of timely completion of investigations involving potential violations of the FEMA Act, despite not entirely agreeing with the relief sought by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>