<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 913 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237481</link>
    <description>The power under section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956 to stay winding up is discretionary and requires the court to be satisfied that the application is bona fide, commercially proper and genuinely directed to revival of the company. Mere willingness to pay creditors or settle claims is insufficient; the court must also ensure that the proposal does not amount to a private takeover of assets or bypass the statutory winding-up and compromise regime. On the facts described, no genuine revival plan for the textile business was shown and the real object appeared to be acquisition of valuable lands for real estate development. The application for a permanent stay of winding up was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 913 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237481</link>
      <description>The power under section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956 to stay winding up is discretionary and requires the court to be satisfied that the application is bona fide, commercially proper and genuinely directed to revival of the company. Mere willingness to pay creditors or settle claims is insufficient; the court must also ensure that the proposal does not amount to a private takeover of assets or bypass the statutory winding-up and compromise regime. On the facts described, no genuine revival plan for the textile business was shown and the real object appeared to be acquisition of valuable lands for real estate development. The application for a permanent stay of winding up was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>