https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237470 Subsequent compliance rendered the petition infructuous after the seized funds were re-deposited into the assessee-company's bank account and the authorities completed proceedings under Section 132(5) of the Income-tax Act and the later re-assessment. With no live controversy remaining for adjudication, the Supreme Court declined to rule on the substantive legal question raised and left that question open for determination in an appropriate future case. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Sep 2013 08:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237470 Subsequent compliance rendered the petition infructuous after the seized funds were re-deposited into the assessee-company's bank account and the authorities completed proceedings under Section 132(5) of the Income-tax Act and the later re-assessment. With no live controversy remaining for adjudication, the Supreme Court declined to rule on the substantive legal question raised and left that question open for determination in an appropriate future case. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237470