<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 886 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237454</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case regarding the adoption of the cost inflation index base year, interpretation of Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, and reliance on previous court decisions. The Court affirmed the importance of legal precedents and consistency in tax law interpretation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 886 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237454</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case regarding the adoption of the cost inflation index base year, interpretation of Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, and reliance on previous court decisions. The Court affirmed the importance of legal precedents and consistency in tax law interpretation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>