<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 880 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237448</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act for unrecorded transactions during the block period, emphasizing the need for proper disclosure and justification of expenses to prevent tax implications. The appellant&#039;s lack of detailed explanations and evidence regarding the expenditure led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the court ruling in favor of the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 880 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237448</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act for unrecorded transactions during the block period, emphasizing the need for proper disclosure and justification of expenses to prevent tax implications. The appellant&#039;s lack of detailed explanations and evidence regarding the expenditure led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the court ruling in favor of the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>