<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 878 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237446</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of closing stock for the assessment year 1987-88. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing them to value the closing stock at the lower of cost or market price, based on the specific circumstances where market value was lower for levy sugar and higher for free sale sugar. The department&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition to closing stock valuation was dismissed, affirming the consistency and validity of the assessee&#039;s valuation method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 878 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237446</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of closing stock for the assessment year 1987-88. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing them to value the closing stock at the lower of cost or market price, based on the specific circumstances where market value was lower for levy sugar and higher for free sale sugar. The department&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition to closing stock valuation was dismissed, affirming the consistency and validity of the assessee&#039;s valuation method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>