<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 876 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237444</link>
    <description>The HC held that dividend income from approved mutual fund units is exempt under Section 10(35)(a), and losses on sale of such units qualify as business losses, not speculative losses. Although the assessee filed a revised computation beyond the time allowed under Section 139(5), reliance on SC precedent mandated that the officer not exploit the assessee&#039;s ignorance of rights. Consequently, the HC remanded the matter to the AO for fresh consideration on merits, ruling against the revenue&#039;s rejection of the revised return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 876 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237444</link>
      <description>The HC held that dividend income from approved mutual fund units is exempt under Section 10(35)(a), and losses on sale of such units qualify as business losses, not speculative losses. Although the assessee filed a revised computation beyond the time allowed under Section 139(5), reliance on SC precedent mandated that the officer not exploit the assessee&#039;s ignorance of rights. Consequently, the HC remanded the matter to the AO for fresh consideration on merits, ruling against the revenue&#039;s rejection of the revised return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>