<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 874 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237442</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, finding that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The judgment analyzed Section 40A(3), Rule 6DD exemptions, and the applicability of Circulars in the context of cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000. The court held that disallowance under Section 40A(3) was not applicable in this case, as the purchases made through commission agents fell within the exemptions provided under Rule 6DD (e) and (k).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 874 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237442</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, finding that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The judgment analyzed Section 40A(3), Rule 6DD exemptions, and the applicability of Circulars in the context of cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000. The court held that disallowance under Section 40A(3) was not applicable in this case, as the purchases made through commission agents fell within the exemptions provided under Rule 6DD (e) and (k).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>