<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 864 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237432</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE remitted a stay matter back for re-adjudication due to a cryptic order lacking reasons and consideration of evidence. The appellant&#039;s defenses regarding Site Formation service tax payment and Commercial and Industrial Construction service were not properly adjudicated initially. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reasoned decision considering all evidence and material facts. The matter was remitted for expeditious re-adjudication, with both parties&#039; submissions to be duly considered, particularly due to the significant revenue involved exceeding Rs. 1 crore. The stay application and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 864 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237432</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE remitted a stay matter back for re-adjudication due to a cryptic order lacking reasons and consideration of evidence. The appellant&#039;s defenses regarding Site Formation service tax payment and Commercial and Industrial Construction service were not properly adjudicated initially. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reasoned decision considering all evidence and material facts. The matter was remitted for expeditious re-adjudication, with both parties&#039; submissions to be duly considered, particularly due to the significant revenue involved exceeding Rs. 1 crore. The stay application and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>