<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner violated binding authority by disregarding a decision of the Tribunal, which remained binding until set aside by a higher authority. The Commissioner&#039;s actions were deemed improper, leading the Tribunal to stay the impugned order and waive the demand until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Additionally, the Tribunal issued a notice to the Commissioner, requiring an explanation for the actions taken, with the potential for contempt proceedings if deemed necessary. The Commissioner was given 15 days to respond, with further consideration scheduled after receiving the explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner violated binding authority by disregarding a decision of the Tribunal, which remained binding until set aside by a higher authority. The Commissioner&#039;s actions were deemed improper, leading the Tribunal to stay the impugned order and waive the demand until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Additionally, the Tribunal issued a notice to the Commissioner, requiring an explanation for the actions taken, with the potential for contempt proceedings if deemed necessary. The Commissioner was given 15 days to respond, with further consideration scheduled after receiving the explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>