<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, ruling that the goods met DGFT standards for Basmati Rice export despite conflicting reports. Emphasizing adherence to DGFT criteria over AGMARK standards, the Tribunal granted permission for the exporter to reclaim the goods without any additional financial obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, ruling that the goods met DGFT standards for Basmati Rice export despite conflicting reports. Emphasizing adherence to DGFT criteria over AGMARK standards, the Tribunal granted permission for the exporter to reclaim the goods without any additional financial obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>