https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237415 A writ petition to quash a departmental charge sheet was held not maintainable once the employee had replied and the inquiry officer had been appointed. The Court reasoned that judicial interference at that stage would improperly stall the disciplinary process, because the truth of the charges could be tested by the inquiry officer on the evidence and documents on record. As no jurisdictional infirmity in issuing the charge sheet was shown, the Court declined interference and left the employee to pursue the departmental remedy in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237415 A writ petition to quash a departmental charge sheet was held not maintainable once the employee had replied and the inquiry officer had been appointed. The Court reasoned that judicial interference at that stage would improperly stall the disciplinary process, because the truth of the charges could be tested by the inquiry officer on the evidence and documents on record. As no jurisdictional infirmity in issuing the charge sheet was shown, the Court declined interference and left the employee to pursue the departmental remedy in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237415