https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237412 The Court directed the petitioner to file a separate appeal against the Order-in-Original not covered in the initial appeal within two weeks. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to decide both appeals without raising objections regarding limitation, allowing the petitioner to address the issue of separate Orders-in-Original through the filing of a new appeal within the specified timeframe. The judgment clarified the procedure for filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) in cases involving multiple Orders-in-Original, ensuring procedural compliance while safeguarding parties from undue prejudice by technicalities. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2015 14:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237412 The Court directed the petitioner to file a separate appeal against the Order-in-Original not covered in the initial appeal within two weeks. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to decide both appeals without raising objections regarding limitation, allowing the petitioner to address the issue of separate Orders-in-Original through the filing of a new appeal within the specified timeframe. The judgment clarified the procedure for filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) in cases involving multiple Orders-in-Original, ensuring procedural compliance while safeguarding parties from undue prejudice by technicalities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237412