<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 832 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237400</link>
    <description>The court recognized the lack of due process in the Commissioner&#039;s decision to prohibit the appellant from working as a Custom House Agent at specific locations. Both parties agreed that the Commissioner&#039;s order should be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the appellant to respond after receiving relevant statements. The Commissioner was directed to pass a fresh order independently. The appellant was granted two weeks to respond, and the Commissioner was instructed to consider the submissions before making a final decision. The appeal was disposed of with the assurance of a fair opportunity for the appellant to respond and a new order based on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 832 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237400</link>
      <description>The court recognized the lack of due process in the Commissioner&#039;s decision to prohibit the appellant from working as a Custom House Agent at specific locations. Both parties agreed that the Commissioner&#039;s order should be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the appellant to respond after receiving relevant statements. The Commissioner was directed to pass a fresh order independently. The appellant was granted two weeks to respond, and the Commissioner was instructed to consider the submissions before making a final decision. The appeal was disposed of with the assurance of a fair opportunity for the appellant to respond and a new order based on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>