<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 826 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237394</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order of the CLB. The CLB was directed to address the removal of auditors while disposing of the petition under Sections 397 and 398, utilizing its broad powers under Section 402 to ensure a comprehensive resolution of oppression and mismanagement claims by a single authority, thereby avoiding jurisdictional conflicts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 826 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237394</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order of the CLB. The CLB was directed to address the removal of auditors while disposing of the petition under Sections 397 and 398, utilizing its broad powers under Section 402 to ensure a comprehensive resolution of oppression and mismanagement claims by a single authority, thereby avoiding jurisdictional conflicts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>