https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237387 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the first proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008, emphasizing that the petitioner should have raised the issue earlier before the Adjudicating Authority. The court advised the petitioner to pursue available avenues of appeal rather than resorting to challenging the rules in a writ petition, indicating that the petitioner could challenge the rules at the appropriate stage during the appeal process. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237387 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the first proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008, emphasizing that the petitioner should have raised the issue earlier before the Adjudicating Authority. The court advised the petitioner to pursue available avenues of appeal rather than resorting to challenging the rules in a writ petition, indicating that the petitioner could challenge the rules at the appropriate stage during the appeal process. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237387