https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237385 The Court upheld the excise duty demand and penalty imposed on the petitioner for allegedly disposing of molasses without payment, rejecting the appeal and revision. The petitioner's challenge to the State Government's order via a writ petition under Article 226 was dismissed, as the rejection of the remission application established liability for excise duty payment and penalty due to removal without payment. The Court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:10:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237385 The Court upheld the excise duty demand and penalty imposed on the petitioner for allegedly disposing of molasses without payment, rejecting the appeal and revision. The petitioner's challenge to the State Government's order via a writ petition under Article 226 was dismissed, as the rejection of the remission application established liability for excise duty payment and penalty due to removal without payment. The Court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237385