<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 800 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment under section 153A, deleted additions made under section 69C, allowed capitalization of commission expenses in the Jaipur project, upheld deletion of donation expenses, and confirmed deletion of disallowance of interest on loans to sister concerns. The Tribunal also found no violation of Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, and partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 800 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment under section 153A, deleted additions made under section 69C, allowed capitalization of commission expenses in the Jaipur project, upheld deletion of donation expenses, and confirmed deletion of disallowance of interest on loans to sister concerns. The Tribunal also found no violation of Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, and partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>