<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 785 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237353</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on non-compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment emphasizes the legal obligations regarding deposit requirements pending appeals, the discretionary powers of the Tribunal, and the importance of adherence to legal provisions to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 785 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237353</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on non-compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment emphasizes the legal obligations regarding deposit requirements pending appeals, the discretionary powers of the Tribunal, and the importance of adherence to legal provisions to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>