https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237352 The court criticized the authorities for imposing onerous conditions for provisional release of seized goods in a case involving import and trading of goods. The court found the conditions excessively burdensome and unjustified, leading to an intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court set aside the conditions to the extent of requiring a bond equivalent to the seized goods' value and payment of differential duty, providing relief to the petitioners. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237352 The court criticized the authorities for imposing onerous conditions for provisional release of seized goods in a case involving import and trading of goods. The court found the conditions excessively burdensome and unjustified, leading to an intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court set aside the conditions to the extent of requiring a bond equivalent to the seized goods' value and payment of differential duty, providing relief to the petitioners. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237352