<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 772 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237340</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the application for condonation of delay, and directed the Tribunal to reexamine the application within one month. The Court emphasized that the legality of the appeal filing process should be determined after the delay is condoned, distinguishing the present case from previous judgments cited by the respondent. The Court&#039;s decision focused solely on the procedural aspect of condonation of delay and appeal filing, without expressing an opinion on the sufficiency of the cause for delay or the merits of the controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 772 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237340</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the application for condonation of delay, and directed the Tribunal to reexamine the application within one month. The Court emphasized that the legality of the appeal filing process should be determined after the delay is condoned, distinguishing the present case from previous judgments cited by the respondent. The Court&#039;s decision focused solely on the procedural aspect of condonation of delay and appeal filing, without expressing an opinion on the sufficiency of the cause for delay or the merits of the controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>