<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 767 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237335</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the orders dated 2.7.2013 and 27.7.2012 regarding the renewal of approval under Section 10 (23C) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the petitioner was not given a hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The authorities were granted liberty to proceed in the matter as per the law independently, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 767 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237335</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the orders dated 2.7.2013 and 27.7.2012 regarding the renewal of approval under Section 10 (23C) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the petitioner was not given a hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The authorities were granted liberty to proceed in the matter as per the law independently, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>