<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237321</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, determining that the assessee company was not entitled to the deduction claimed under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act as it did not receive dividends from another domestic company but from a partnership firm. The adjustment made by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(1)(a) disallowing the deduction was deemed permissible, as the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to make such adjustments. The case outcome favored the revenue, leading to the matter being referred back to the Tribunal for further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237321</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, determining that the assessee company was not entitled to the deduction claimed under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act as it did not receive dividends from another domestic company but from a partnership firm. The adjustment made by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(1)(a) disallowing the deduction was deemed permissible, as the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to make such adjustments. The case outcome favored the revenue, leading to the matter being referred back to the Tribunal for further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>